But had I not known what it was and seen it first, say, out in the desert at dusk, I might easily have thought it a UFO.įor decades black triangular-shaped objects have been labeled UFOs. It was, in fact, the B-2 Stealth Bomber, looping around to make another run over the Pasadena Rose Parade on January 1, an annual tradition. It was almost completely silent, made rapid turns and accelerations, and was so nonreflective it looked like a hole in the sky, almost otherworldly. And the Navy is certainly not immune to that.One morning several years ago a black triangular-shaped object flew over my home in the San Gabriel Mountains in southern California. So, I think-I think, yeah, it shouldn’t be a surprise that maybe there is an increased interest in our capabilities as it relates to our nuclear technology. You have nuclear-powered submarines, some of those with nuclear weapons on board, or nuclear-certainly nuclear capabilities. You have a nuclear-powered carrier with aircraft on board that-and then you have nuclear-powered destroyers. And when you look at all these naval ships out there-let’s take the Nimitz battle carrier fleet for example-in some cases you’re talking about a nuclear footprint probably bigger than most cities. I think that there is certainly at this point enough data to demonstrate there is an interest in our nuclear technology, a potential to even interfere with that nuclear technology. So that is equally, for me, just as concerning. But in the same context, we also have data suggesting that in other countries these things have interfered with their nuclear technology and actually turned them on, put them online. And I think to some they would probably say, well, that’s a sign that whatever this is, is something that is peaceful. Now in this country we’ve had incidents where these UAPs have interfered and actually brought offline our nuclear capabilities. government can provide the data and the evidence and information and then allow the American people to decide what we think this is about. So what matters is really what you think about this. In this case, you, your audience, they’re the jury. What we’re realizing is that the facts are painting a far more compelling picture than what we thought. And that is really what we’re doing today. We were-we were very agnostic, if you will, or objective about this topic and tried to allow the facts to lead us down a certain path. And so therein lies, if you will, a little bit of our approach. We were just trying to get to the bottom of what they were. So, we really didn’t care what these were. We applied the same level of rigor and methodologies we did at hunting terrorists and spies as we did in hunting UFOs. Very much as an investigator, which I used to be. And from that perspective, it’s very important that-I’ve always-I had a very simple job, and that is to collect the truth and speak the truth. What matters is what the data and the facts tell us. So, I feel or do I believe this is, quote, “extraterrestrial”? Let me be very careful before I answer that by saying at the end of the day, Jackie, it doesn’t matter what I think or what I believe. And so, this goes to your last part of your question.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |