Market holidays and trading hours provided by Copp Clark Limited. All content of the Dow Jones branded indices Copyright S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and/or its affiliates. Standard & Poor’s and S&P are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC and Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC. Dow Jones: The Dow Jones branded indices are proprietary to and are calculated, distributed and marketed by DJI Opco, a subsidiary of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and have been licensed for use to S&P Opco, LLC and CNN. (Andrew Harnik/AP) NaN Facebook’s Oversight Board on Wednesday upheld the social network’s ban on former president Donald Trump but punted the ultimate decision back to the company, bringing. Chicago Mercantile: Certain market data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. US market indices are shown in real time, except for the S&P 500 which is refreshed every two minutes. Your CNN account Log in to your CNN account Read our ongoing coverage of Facebook at cnn.com. Watch this space: CNN is one of 17 US news organizations reporting on the Facebook Papers. “They’ve got to do more to police hatred, vitriol, bullying on the platform and we’re seeing that coming out in spades through all of these different revelations,” Nossel said. The redacted versions were obtained by a consortium of 17 US news organizations, including CNN. The documents were provided by Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen as evidence to support disclosures she made to the Securities and Exchange Commission and provided to Congress in redacted form by Haugen’s legal counsel. However, internal Facebook documents reviewed by CNN showed a company that was fundamentally unprepared to moderate the “Stop the Steal” movement, which was a lead organizer of the insurrection. The first of the Facebook Papers revealed that the company’s Chief Operational Officer Sheryl Sandberg downplayed the platform’s role in the Jan. “I think they’re very ambivalent about regulation.” “They didn’t want to bear the full weight of responsibility for big questions like, ‘Should Donald Trump be allowed on the platform,’” Nossel said. The body, which the company says will comprise 40 independent experts who will serve in three-year terms, has been described by many as Facebook’s own Supreme Court as it will adjudicate questions of content policy on the company’s platforms as they arise. The board adjudicates cases on controversial content that is both left up or taken down - but these cases are just “the tip of the iceberg” when it comes to oversight at Facebook, Nossel said. There are 20 members on the board with backgrounds ranging from law and human rights to journalism. The Oversight Board is an effort by Facebook to bring in outside expertise to oversee the platform’s content moderation decisions. On some occasions, Facebook failed to provide relevant. The board also said Facebook was not “fully forthcoming” about its cross-check system, which is used to make content decisions for high-profile users. The tech giant has not been fully forthcoming on Cross-Check, the oversight board said in a report published on Thursday. Not stopping 'Stop the Steal:' Facebook Papers paint damning picture of company's role in insurrection
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |